Skip to main content


It is the contention of this paper that a better understanding of Locke’s political theory can be gained by comparative study of his later religious text, The Reasonableness of Christianity alongside his Two Treatises of Civil Government. These texts contain notable parallels and contrasts which we describe in this article. Specifically, Locke’s critique of Robert Filmer’s patriarchalist theory of absolute monarchy both address the implications of the biblical Fall from an original state of human kind in the biblical account of the Garden of Eden. Locke’s account of natural human equality, including gender equality in his Second Treatise then relies upon his prior demolition of the claim that the Fall lead to the establishment of a legitimate form of political domination and this account is consistent with and effectively reinforced by the emphasis on free will in his later religious writings.


File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
18 Jul 2022
488 kB



  • Alternative title
    • “Have we not an equal interest with the men of this nation?”

  • Journal title
    • International Social Science Review

  • Volume
    • 92

  • Issue
    • 1

  • Date submitted

    18 July 2022

  • Keywords
  • Additional information
    • Acknowledgements:

      Daniel Skidmore-Hess is Professor of Political Science at Armstrong State University and teaches political theory with a primary interest in modern political thought and political economy. Cathy Skidmore-Hess is Associate Professor of History at Georgia Southern University with research interests in gender and religion.