Skip to main content

Abstract

Today’s schools turn to computers for all aspects of learning, including assessment. While advantages to computer testing do exist, the comparability between paper pencil tests (PPT) and computer-based tests (CBT) must be considered. This study examined whether the testing medium impacts student performance in math assessment by addressing three questions. First, does a test mode effect exist, as evidenced by mean score difference between a CBT and a PPT? Second, does question type: multiple choice, constructed response, or extended response, relate to student performance? Third, does either gender or computer experience and familiarity impact CBT and PPT scores? Eighty 6th grade students took math tests with half of the questions on a PPT and half of the questions on a CBT. A computer familiarity survey was completed prior to the unit tests. Significant differences were found for one of the unit tests and for some of the question types.

Keywords: paper-pencil tests, computer-based tests, test mode effect, mathematics assessment, item construct

Files

File nameDate UploadedVisibilityFile size
A_Comparison_of_Computer_Based_Testing_and_Paper_and_Pencil_Testing_in_Math_Assessment.pdf
19 Jul 2022
Public
1.1 MB

Metrics

Metadata

  • Institution
    • Cumming

  • Publisher
    • Online Journal of New Horizons in Education

  • Date submitted

    19 July 2022

  • Additional information
    • Author Biography:

      Tara McClelland is a public school teacher and graduate alumni of the University of North Georgia. Josh Cuevas is a professor and educational psychologist at the University of North Georgia.